AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/003
*Corresponding Author: Mark I.M. Noble, Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland., Scotland,
Citation: Mark I.M. Noble, Are Platelet Aggregation Tests the Best Way to Assess New Drugs for Arterial Disease, j General Medicine and Clinical Practice, Doi: 10.31579/2639-4162/003
Copyright: © 2018 Mark I.M. Noble. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 July 2018 | Accepted: 01 August 2018 | Published: 06 August 2018
Keywords: Arterial Stenosis; Shear-Stress Induced Activation, Serotonin Platelet Feedback.
Over many years, laboratory testing of platelet aggregability have been carried out in attempts to develop drugs that would prevent thrombosis in arteries. The problems encountered included the question of methodology. Blood samples have to be anticoagulated in order to study the platelets. Anti-coagulation with citrate and tests on derived platelet rich plasma did not correlate at all well with thrombus growth in the stenosed coronary arteries of experimental animals and citrate removes the calcium ions which are vital for platelet function. Anticoagulation with heparin also interfered with platelet function, so that now, hirudins are the preferred anticoagulant. However it was observed that if, instead of stimulating platelet aggregation with adrenaline or ADP, serotonin was applied to the preparation, very little aggregation took place in spite of serotonin 5HT2A antagonists being the most potent inhibitors of thrombus growth in experimental animals. Another indicator that primary platelet agggregation is not a predictor of in vivo efficacy was the finding that 5HT2A antagonism inhibited aggregate growth. In a stenosed artery the platelets are activated by increased shear stress and blood turbulence with release of platelet serotonin causing positive feedback activation of more platelets. At present, there does not seem to be a bench in vitro test that accurately predicts in vivo efficacy in stenosed artery occlusive thrombosis.
In the obituary of Gustav Born [1], one finds the following statement about his work on blood platelets, "When stimulated by blood vessel damage or blood clotting, these tiny cells “aggregate” together, plugging the damaged vessel and thereby preventing any further escape of blood. To measure this quantitatively, Gus devised and developed a simple, but extremely effective, device (known as the Born aggregometer) and, in doing so, launched an entirely new sub-discipline of haematology often referred to as “platelet aggregometry” (a term he hated). The aggregometer, used in laboratories and hospitals around the world, revolutionised the diagnosis of platelet-related diseases as well as providing a tool eminently suited to the study of the basic biology of these cells and their response to drugs". Very true and Born deserves all the credit he achieved, but is the statement still true today?
The limitations of Born aggregometry
The method involved anticoagulating blood samples with citrate and using a centrifuge to separate out a layer of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). When aggregating agents such as collagen are added to PRP in a cuvette, the platelets aggregate and settle at the bottom of the cuvette causing an increase in light transmission through the PRP which can be recorded on a chart or computer [2].
The first problem with this is that citrate anticoagulates the blood sample by removing the calcium ions (Ca2+). However, (Ca2+) is essential for normal platelet function!
An equally obvious problem is that such in vitro bench tests take place in very different circumstances than real life where one has whole blood flowing through vessels. John Folts had the idea that platelet aggregation would be best studied in partially obstructed arteries in an anaesthetised animal [3,4,5], and showed the various potentcies of platelet aggregation inhibitors [5].
How well does PRP aggregometry correlate with in vivo platelet thrombosis?
Torr at al [2] compared the results of ex vivo classical aggregometry of PRP prepared from experimental animals with the number of flow reductions in a stenosed coronary artery of anaesthetised dogs. Measurements were made before and after administraion of a putative platelet aggregation inhibitor ritanserin. They used collagen and ADP as aggregation stimulants, collagen at 10µM and 50µM, also 5µM plus adrenaline, ADP at 2µg plus adrenaline, 4µg and 6µg. The inhibition by ritanserin in number and slopes of the flow reductions in the animals was very much greater than the inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation.
Clearly the platelet aggregation results were a very poor way of assessing the inhibition of thrombus growth in the artery by ritanserin. Why use ritanserin? This drug was an inhibitor of the platelet serotonin 5HT2A receptor and was a way of testing the theory that platelet activation in arteries results from the haemodynamic consequences of partial obstruction of the artery.
Arterial Stenosis
At an arterial narrowing (stenosis),
∂P = a1Q + a2Q2
where ∂P is the pressure drop across the stenosis, Q is the flow through the artery, a1 and a2 are proportionality parameters. This means that the relationship between the variables ∂P and Q is quadratic and stenotic resistance increases with flow. a1Q expresses viscous resistance, while a2Q2 expresses turbulance. Another quantitative expression of a stenosis is the area ratio As/Ao, where As is the cross-sectional area of the stenosis and Ao is the cross-sectional are of the open, normal artery; this can be expressed as a percentage as (1 - As/Ao)x100. As the same flow has to go through both the normal section, Ao and the much smaller As of the stenosis, the blood has to go faster, i.e., velocity of blood flow increases; this is called convective acceleration. One can easily observe this phenomenon by watching a placid full river running into a gorge.
Acceleration is determined by force according to Newton's second law of motion,
F = ma
Where F is force, m is mass and a is acceleration. So we envisage a mass of fluid accelerating into a narrowing of the artery exerting greater force, and just as objects in a river gorge feel force, so do blood cells in a stenosis. This effect is called shear stress because it is equal to the force divided by the area of the surface of the object.
Activation of platelets by exposure to increased shear stress and turbulance causes release of serotonin which is present in high quantities in the dense granules [6]. The serotonin is released upon activation and activates more platelets via the 5HT2A receptors, thus maintaining thrombus growth. Thrombus growth is completely abolished by 5HT2A platelet receptor antagonism [7]. The drug used by McAuliffe et al [7] was trialed in stable coronary disease patients and found to cause no change in bleeding time and to have no cerebral or other signicant side effects [8].
The effect of serotonin on platelet aggregation
This subject has been neglected because serotonin is said to be weak agonist for platelet aggregation [9]. At least these authors [9] did not use PRP, but whole blood using flow cytometry, impedance aggregometry and filtragometry. They concluded that their data suggest that 5-HT per se does not activate platelets, but dose-dependently enhances platelet activation induced by ADP and, in particular, thrombin in whole blood. This effect is mediated by 5-HT2A receptors. While it is true that the coronary thrombosis stimulated by adrenaline is also abolished by 5HT2A antagonism [7], there is a very great difference between the high potency of inhibition of thrombus growth not so stimulated, with the weakness of serotonin in in vitro testing [9].
Another problem with whole blood aggregometry is the activation of platelets by heparin [10] making heparins unsuitable for in vitro testing. The most suitable anticoagulants for in vitro work are the hirudins, because the effects of hirudins on platelet function are different from those of unfractionated heparin. Spontaneous aggregation was rarely observed in hirudinized PRP compared to citrate-PRP. In comparison with citrate-PRP, two hirudins reduced the maximal response to epinephrine, but had no influence on the maximal response to ADP. Spontaneous aggregation is rarely observed in hirudinized PRP compared to citrate-PRP. In comparison with citrate-PRP, both hirudins reduced the maximal response to adrenaline, but had no influence on the maximal response to ADP [11]. Other authors agree that of the anticoagulants investigated, the selective thrombin inhibitor hirudin is the most suitable anticoagulant for studies of platelet aggregation in vitro in whole blood, e.g., [12].
Menys [13], studying platelet aggregation to collagen, used hirudin to maintain normocalcaemia, thereby avoiding erroneous findings often obtained with citrated blood. Platelet aggregation was quantified by optical aggregometry, and aggregate growth by single platelet counting, i.e., as the aggregates grew, fewer single platlets remained. He concluded that 5-HT contributes to collagen induced aggregate growth and 5-HT2 receptor antagonism with ICI 170809 retards the rate of growth. This could explain the efficacy of 5-HT2 antagonists in limiting coronary thrombosis despite the limited role of 5-HT in primary aggregation. ICI 170809 is the same drug as that used by McAuliffe [7] in the Folts model and by Noble et al in patients [8]. So the classical platelet aggregation tests measure the wrong thing. It is the aggrgation of platelets that leads to thrombus growth, not the primary aggregation.
It is the reliance on platelet aggregation tests that has led to the development of the present dual anti-platelet therapy of aspirin (antagonising thromboxane) and clopidogrel (antagonising ADP), both of which are ubiquitously present in tissues and antagonism of them inevitably leads to escessive bleeding. Serotonin, on the other hand is only present to any extent in brain and platelets and not in tissue. Excess bleeding is therefore absent [8].
What happens at the vessel wall?
The endothelial layer is covered by a layer of gel called the glycocalyx, dysfunction of which has been postulated to be the first step in the development of atheromatous lesions [14, 15]. Such dysfunction occurs by oxidized LDL [16] and with hyperglycaemia [17] leading to cell adhesion to the endothlium [18] and thrombosis [17]. However, in arteries with normal lumenal cross sectional area, this does not result in thrombotic occlusion. That only occurs in stenoses where very high concentration of serotoin occur in a confined space y the mechanism described above. A literature search for a bench model of hirudinised whole blood being forced through a stenosis failed to find any such attempt at a more realistic test for predicting clinical efficacy.
What test must one use?
Unfortunately, none of the laboratory tests on platelets realistically simulates the in vivo situation of obstructive arterial thrombosis. The only way at present to test potential treatments is by using the Folts model, i.e., animal experimentation. This has been a reliable predictor of clinical efficacy, and has brought to light the importance of serotonin antagonism in spite of the fact that serotonin is a weak agonist in bench tests [19 - 30].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
